i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K Athlon II X2 265

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
1890 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
1117 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 265

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.9 FPS
1080p
24.4 FPS
1440p
43.0 FPS
1440p
17.6 FPS
2160p
29.4 FPS
2160p
12.0 FPS
w1440p
38.7 FPS
w1440p
15.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.0 FPS
1080p
47.1 FPS
1440p
76.8 FPS
1440p
35.4 FPS
2160p
55.3 FPS
2160p
25.3 FPS
w1440p
70.2 FPS
w1440p
32.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
148.0 FPS
1080p
69.7 FPS
1440p
110.7 FPS
1440p
53.2 FPS
2160p
81.2 FPS
2160p
38.5 FPS
w1440p
101.6 FPS
w1440p
48.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
234.1 FPS
1080p
115.0 FPS
1440p
178.3 FPS
1440p
88.7 FPS
2160p
133.1 FPS
2160p
65.1 FPS
w1440p
164.5 FPS
w1440p
81.7 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 265
  • The Athlon II X2 265 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 specifications

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 Architecture

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 265
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR2, DDR3
Part#SRMBDADX265OCK23GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 Cache

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 265
Cache L180K (per core)128K
Cache L22MB (per core)1MB

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 Cores

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 265
# of Cores142
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 Performance

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 265
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x16.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzN/A

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 Physical

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 265
Die Size257 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 265 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments