i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Phenom II X3 710

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
2442 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
907 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Phenom II X3 710

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.3 FPS
1080p
35.4 FPS
1440p
69.3 FPS
1440p
25.5 FPS
2160p
47.5 FPS
2160p
17.5 FPS
w1440p
62.5 FPS
w1440p
23.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
152.6 FPS
1080p
65.0 FPS
1440p
115.5 FPS
1440p
48.9 FPS
2160p
83.7 FPS
2160p
35.2 FPS
w1440p
105.8 FPS
w1440p
44.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
209.0 FPS
1080p
94.5 FPS
1440p
161.8 FPS
1440p
72.3 FPS
2160p
119.9 FPS
2160p
52.9 FPS
w1440p
149.1 FPS
w1440p
66.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
321.7 FPS
1080p
153.7 FPS
1440p
254.3 FPS
1440p
119.1 FPS
2160p
192.2 FPS
2160p
88.3 FPS
w1440p
235.8 FPS
w1440p
109.8 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X3 710
  • The Phenom II X3 710 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 specifications

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 Architecture

i5-12400 Phenom II X3 710
CodenameAlder Lake-SHeka
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YHDX710WFK3DGIHDX710WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 Cache

i5-12400 Phenom II X3 710
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 Cores

i5-12400 Phenom II X3 710
# of Cores63
# of Threads123
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 Performance

i5-12400 Phenom II X3 710
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier25.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 Physical

i5-12400 Phenom II X3 710
Die Size163 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i5-12400 vs Phenom II X3 710 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments