i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Athlon II X2 240

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
1642 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
938 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 240

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
144.1 FPS
1080p
48.7 FPS
1440p
104.7 FPS
1440p
35.4 FPS
2160p
75.5 FPS
2160p
25.5 FPS
w1440p
96.4 FPS
w1440p
32.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
213.9 FPS
1080p
85.5 FPS
1440p
163.8 FPS
1440p
65.0 FPS
2160p
124.3 FPS
2160p
48.9 FPS
w1440p
152.8 FPS
w1440p
60.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
283.7 FPS
1080p
122.3 FPS
1440p
222.8 FPS
1440p
94.5 FPS
2160p
173.0 FPS
2160p
72.3 FPS
w1440p
209.2 FPS
w1440p
88.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
423.3 FPS
1080p
195.9 FPS
1440p
341.0 FPS
1440p
153.7 FPS
2160p
270.6 FPS
2160p
119.1 FPS
w1440p
321.9 FPS
w1440p
144.2 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 240
  • The Athlon II X2 240 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 specifications

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 Architecture

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 240
CodenameAlder Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YADX240OCK23GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 Cache

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 240
Cache L180K (per core)256K
Cache L21.25MB (per core)2MB

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 Cores

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 240
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 Performance

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 240
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier25.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 Physical

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 240
Die Size163 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 240 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments