i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Athlon II X2 220

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
1634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
933 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 220

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.2 FPS
1080p
20.0 FPS
1440p
42.6 FPS
1440p
14.4 FPS
2160p
29.2 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
w1440p
38.4 FPS
w1440p
13.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.0 FPS
1080p
39.6 FPS
1440p
76.2 FPS
1440p
29.7 FPS
2160p
55.0 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
w1440p
69.7 FPS
w1440p
27.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
142.9 FPS
1080p
59.1 FPS
1440p
109.8 FPS
1440p
44.9 FPS
2160p
80.8 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
101.0 FPS
w1440p
41.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
226.5 FPS
1080p
98.2 FPS
1440p
177.0 FPS
1440p
75.5 FPS
2160p
132.4 FPS
2160p
55.6 FPS
w1440p
163.6 FPS
w1440p
69.5 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 220
  • The Athlon II X2 220 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 specifications

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Architecture

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 220
CodenameAlder Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YADX220OCK22GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Cache

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 220
Cache L180K (per core)128K
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Cores

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 220
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Performance

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 220
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier25.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Physical

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 220
Die Size163 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 220 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments