i5-11600K vs i5-14600K - Need For Speed: Payback TITAN V - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K i5-14600K

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
4308 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-11600K vs i5-14600K in Need For Speed: Payback using TITAN V - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K i5-14600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
175.0 FPS
1080p
188.2 FPS
1440p
120.7 FPS
1440p
124.6 FPS
2160p
83.6 FPS
2160p
86.2 FPS
w1440p
109.3 FPS
w1440p
112.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
251.3 FPS
1080p
266.8 FPS
1440p
184.5 FPS
1440p
189.5 FPS
2160p
135.5 FPS
2160p
139.0 FPS
w1440p
169.8 FPS
w1440p
174.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
327.5 FPS
1080p
345.4 FPS
1440p
248.3 FPS
1440p
254.3 FPS
2160p
187.3 FPS
2160p
191.8 FPS
w1440p
230.3 FPS
w1440p
235.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
480.0 FPS
1080p
502.5 FPS
1440p
375.9 FPS
1440p
384.1 FPS
2160p
291.1 FPS
2160p
297.5 FPS
w1440p
351.3 FPS
w1440p
358.9 FPS
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-14600K
  • The i5-14600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-14600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-11600K vs i5-14600K specifications

i5-11600K vs i5-14600K Architecture

i5-11600K i5-14600K
CodenameRocket LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i5-11600K vs i5-14600K Cache

i5-11600K i5-14600K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)24 MB (shared)

i5-11600K vs i5-14600K Cores

i5-11600K i5-14600K

i5-11600K vs i5-14600K Features

i5-11600K i5-14600K

i5-11600K vs i5-14600K Notes

i5-11600K i5-14600K

i5-11600K vs i5-14600K Performance

i5-11600K i5-14600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier39.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

i5-11600K vs i5-14600K Physical

i5-11600K i5-14600K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-11600K vs i5-14600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments