i5-11600K vs i5-12400 - Need For Speed: Payback TITAN V - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
3240 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-11600K vs i5-12400 in Need For Speed: Payback using TITAN V - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
175.0 FPS
1080p
174.3 FPS
1440p
120.7 FPS
1440p
120.5 FPS
2160p
83.6 FPS
2160p
83.5 FPS
w1440p
109.3 FPS
w1440p
109.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
251.3 FPS
1080p
250.4 FPS
1440p
184.5 FPS
1440p
184.2 FPS
2160p
135.5 FPS
2160p
135.3 FPS
w1440p
169.8 FPS
w1440p
169.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
327.5 FPS
1080p
326.5 FPS
1440p
248.3 FPS
1440p
248.0 FPS
2160p
187.3 FPS
2160p
187.2 FPS
w1440p
230.3 FPS
w1440p
230.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
480.0 FPS
1080p
478.8 FPS
1440p
375.9 FPS
1440p
375.5 FPS
2160p
291.1 FPS
2160p
290.8 FPS
w1440p
351.3 FPS
w1440p
350.8 FPS
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-11600K vs i5-12400 specifications

i5-11600K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i5-11600K i5-12400
CodenameRocket LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-11600K vs i5-12400 Cache

i5-11600K i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i5-11600K vs i5-12400 Cores

i5-11600K i5-12400
# of Cores66
# of Threads1212
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11600K vs i5-12400 Features

i5-11600K i5-12400

i5-11600K vs i5-12400 Notes

i5-11600K i5-12400

i5-11600K vs i5-12400 Performance

i5-11600K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier39.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i5-11600K vs i5-12400 Physical

i5-11600K i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i5-11600K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments