i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
21536 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
2910 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
43.6 FPS
1080p
43.3 FPS
1440p
31.3 FPS
1440p
31.1 FPS
2160p
21.4 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
w1440p
28.2 FPS
w1440p
28.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
77.7 FPS
1080p
77.3 FPS
1440p
58.4 FPS
1440p
58.1 FPS
2160p
42.0 FPS
2160p
41.8 FPS
w1440p
53.4 FPS
w1440p
53.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
111.9 FPS
1080p
111.3 FPS
1440p
85.5 FPS
1440p
85.1 FPS
2160p
62.5 FPS
2160p
62.3 FPS
w1440p
78.5 FPS
w1440p
78.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
180.2 FPS
1080p
179.2 FPS
1440p
139.7 FPS
1440p
139.0 FPS
2160p
103.7 FPS
2160p
103.3 FPS
w1440p
128.8 FPS
w1440p
128.1 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 3600X
  • The Ryzen 5 3600X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 5 3600X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X specifications

i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X Architecture

i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X
CodenameComet LakeZen 2
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Ryzen 5 (Zen 2)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jul 2019

i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X Cache

i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)32MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X Cores

i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X
# of Cores66
# of Threads1212
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X Features

i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X

i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X Notes

i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X

i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X Performance

i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier29.0x38.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X Physical

i5-10400 Ryzen 5 3600X
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelTSMC
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm7 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknown4,800 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10400 vs Ryzen 5 3600X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments