i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9350KF i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

10458 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2562 Pts
4683 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9350KF i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
130.4 FPS
1080p
157.9 FPS
1440p
94.7 FPS
1440p
109.6 FPS
2160p
68.3 FPS
2160p
79.0 FPS
w1440p
87.2 FPS
w1440p
100.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
196.8 FPS
1080p
230.8 FPS
1440p
150.5 FPS
1440p
170.2 FPS
2160p
114.1 FPS
2160p
129.1 FPS
w1440p
140.4 FPS
w1440p
158.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
263.2 FPS
1080p
303.6 FPS
1440p
206.3 FPS
1440p
230.8 FPS
2160p
160.0 FPS
2160p
179.3 FPS
w1440p
193.6 FPS
w1440p
216.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
396.0 FPS
1080p
449.4 FPS
1440p
317.9 FPS
1440p
351.9 FPS
2160p
251.6 FPS
2160p
279.5 FPS
w1440p
299.9 FPS
w1440p
332.3 FPS
i3-9350KF
  • The i3-9350KF has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9350KF has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K specifications

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Architecture

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
CodenameCoffee LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Cache

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Cores

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
# of Cores424
# of Threads432
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Performance

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier40.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP91 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzup to 5.8 GHz

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Physical

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments