i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9350KF i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

10458 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2562 Pts
4683 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9350KF i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.1 FPS
1080p
105.4 FPS
1440p
62.7 FPS
1440p
72.5 FPS
2160p
42.9 FPS
2160p
49.7 FPS
w1440p
56.5 FPS
w1440p
65.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
140.2 FPS
1080p
164.7 FPS
1440p
106.1 FPS
1440p
120.1 FPS
2160p
76.7 FPS
2160p
87.0 FPS
w1440p
97.1 FPS
w1440p
109.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
193.4 FPS
1080p
224.0 FPS
1440p
149.5 FPS
1440p
167.6 FPS
2160p
110.4 FPS
2160p
124.3 FPS
w1440p
137.7 FPS
w1440p
154.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
299.7 FPS
1080p
342.5 FPS
1440p
236.3 FPS
1440p
262.8 FPS
2160p
178.0 FPS
2160p
198.9 FPS
w1440p
218.9 FPS
w1440p
243.5 FPS
i3-9350KF
  • The i3-9350KF has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9350KF has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K specifications

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Architecture

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
CodenameCoffee LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Cache

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Cores

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
# of Cores424
# of Threads432
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Performance

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier40.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP91 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzup to 5.8 GHz

i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K Physical

i3-9350KF i9-13900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9350KF vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments