i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3080 Ti Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9350KF Athlon II X4 620

Multi-Thread Performance

10458 Pts
2938 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2562 Pts
906 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3080 Ti Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9350KF Athlon II X4 620

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
181.5 FPS
1080p
76.8 FPS
1440p
133.3 FPS
1440p
56.4 FPS
2160p
93.8 FPS
2160p
39.7 FPS
w1440p
121.5 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
258.9 FPS
1080p
126.1 FPS
1440p
200.5 FPS
1440p
96.9 FPS
2160p
149.3 FPS
2160p
71.7 FPS
w1440p
185.5 FPS
w1440p
89.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
336.4 FPS
1080p
175.4 FPS
1440p
267.6 FPS
1440p
137.5 FPS
2160p
204.8 FPS
2160p
103.7 FPS
w1440p
249.6 FPS
w1440p
127.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
491.2 FPS
1080p
273.9 FPS
1440p
401.9 FPS
1440p
218.6 FPS
2160p
315.8 FPS
2160p
167.8 FPS
w1440p
377.6 FPS
w1440p
204.0 FPS
i3-9350KF
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9350KF has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i3-9350KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X4 620
  • The Athlon II X4 620 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 specifications

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 Architecture

i3-9350KF Athlon II X4 620
CodenameCoffee LakePropus
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Athlon II X4 (Propus)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX620WFK42GIADX620WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Sep 2009

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 Cache

i3-9350KF Athlon II X4 620
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 Cores

i3-9350KF Athlon II X4 620
# of Cores44
# of Threads44
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 Performance

i3-9350KF Athlon II X4 620
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier40.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP91 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 Physical

i3-9350KF Athlon II X4 620
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X4 620 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments