i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9350KF Athlon II X2 260

Multi-Thread Performance

10458 Pts
1873 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2562 Pts
1074 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9350KF Athlon II X2 260

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
130.4 FPS
1080p
57.3 FPS
1440p
94.7 FPS
1440p
41.6 FPS
2160p
68.3 FPS
2160p
30.0 FPS
w1440p
87.2 FPS
w1440p
38.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
196.8 FPS
1080p
98.3 FPS
1440p
150.5 FPS
1440p
74.7 FPS
2160p
114.1 FPS
2160p
56.3 FPS
w1440p
140.4 FPS
w1440p
69.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
263.2 FPS
1080p
139.2 FPS
1440p
206.3 FPS
1440p
107.7 FPS
2160p
160.0 FPS
2160p
82.6 FPS
w1440p
193.6 FPS
w1440p
100.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
396.0 FPS
1080p
221.1 FPS
1440p
317.9 FPS
1440p
173.9 FPS
2160p
251.6 FPS
2160p
135.2 FPS
w1440p
299.9 FPS
w1440p
163.2 FPS
i3-9350KF
  • The i3-9350KF has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-9350KF has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-9350KF has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350KF has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i3-9350KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 260
  • The Athlon II X2 260 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 specifications

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Architecture

i3-9350KF Athlon II X2 260
CodenameCoffee LakeRegor
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX260OCK23GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019May 2010

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Cache

i3-9350KF Athlon II X2 260
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)1MB

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Cores

i3-9350KF Athlon II X2 260
# of Cores42
# of Threads42
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Performance

i3-9350KF Athlon II X2 260
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier40.0x16.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP91 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.15 V

i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Physical

i3-9350KF Athlon II X2 260
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9350KF vs Athlon II X2 260 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments