i3-9320 vs i9-14900K - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i9-14900K

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
41458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
5619 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9320 vs i9-14900K in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i9-14900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
124.1 FPS
1080p
151.7 FPS
1440p
89.8 FPS
1440p
104.4 FPS
2160p
61.7 FPS
2160p
71.8 FPS
w1440p
81.1 FPS
w1440p
94.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
188.8 FPS
1080p
223.2 FPS
1440p
143.9 FPS
1440p
163.4 FPS
2160p
104.7 FPS
2160p
119.1 FPS
w1440p
132.0 FPS
w1440p
149.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
253.6 FPS
1080p
294.7 FPS
1440p
198.0 FPS
1440p
222.3 FPS
2160p
147.6 FPS
2160p
166.4 FPS
w1440p
183.0 FPS
w1440p
205.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
383.1 FPS
1080p
437.8 FPS
1440p
306.2 FPS
1440p
340.3 FPS
2160p
233.6 FPS
2160p
260.9 FPS
w1440p
284.8 FPS
w1440p
316.7 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-14900K
  • The i9-14900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-14900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i9-14900K specifications

i3-9320 vs i9-14900K Architecture

i3-9320 i9-14900K
CodenameCoffee LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i3-9320 vs i9-14900K Cache

i3-9320 i9-14900K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)36 MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i9-14900K Cores

i3-9320 i9-14900K

i3-9320 vs i9-14900K Performance

i3-9320 i9-14900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier37.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP62 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 6 GHz

i3-9320 vs i9-14900K Physical

i3-9320 i9-14900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-9320 vs i9-14900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments