i3-9100F vs i5-14600K - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 650 Ti Boost - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100F i5-14600K

Multi-Thread Performance

8988 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2343 Pts
4308 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9100F vs i5-14600K in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 650 Ti Boost - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100F i5-14600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
35.4 FPS
1440p
20.6 FPS
1440p
22.1 FPS
2160p
14.2 FPS
2160p
15.3 FPS
w1440p
18.6 FPS
w1440p
20.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
65.0 FPS
1440p
40.6 FPS
1440p
43.2 FPS
2160p
29.3 FPS
2160p
31.3 FPS
w1440p
37.1 FPS
w1440p
39.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
94.5 FPS
1440p
60.6 FPS
1440p
64.2 FPS
2160p
44.4 FPS
2160p
47.3 FPS
w1440p
55.7 FPS
w1440p
59.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
153.7 FPS
1440p
100.6 FPS
1440p
106.3 FPS
2160p
74.6 FPS
2160p
79.3 FPS
w1440p
92.7 FPS
w1440p
98.2 FPS
i3-9100F
  • The i3-9100F has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9100F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-14600K
  • The i5-14600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-14600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-9100F vs i5-14600K specifications

i3-9100F vs i5-14600K Architecture

i3-9100F i5-14600K
CodenameCoffee LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i3-9100F vs i5-14600K Cache

i3-9100F i5-14600K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)24 MB (shared)

i3-9100F vs i5-14600K Cores

i3-9100F i5-14600K

i3-9100F vs i5-14600K Performance

i3-9100F i5-14600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier36.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

i3-9100F vs i5-14600K Physical

i3-9100F i5-14600K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9100F vs i5-14600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments