i3-9100F vs i5-12400 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100F i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

8988 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2343 Pts
3240 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9100F vs i5-12400 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100F i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
66.1 FPS
1080p
73.8 FPS
1440p
47.7 FPS
1440p
53.3 FPS
2160p
33.3 FPS
2160p
37.2 FPS
w1440p
43.3 FPS
w1440p
48.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
111.0 FPS
1080p
121.9 FPS
1440p
84.0 FPS
1440p
92.4 FPS
2160p
61.6 FPS
2160p
67.8 FPS
w1440p
77.3 FPS
w1440p
85.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
155.9 FPS
1080p
170.0 FPS
1440p
120.3 FPS
1440p
131.4 FPS
2160p
89.9 FPS
2160p
98.4 FPS
w1440p
111.3 FPS
w1440p
121.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
245.7 FPS
1080p
266.2 FPS
1440p
192.8 FPS
1440p
209.6 FPS
2160p
146.6 FPS
2160p
159.6 FPS
w1440p
179.2 FPS
w1440p
195.0 FPS
i3-9100F
  • The i3-9100F has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9100F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-9100F vs i5-12400 specifications

i3-9100F vs i5-12400 Architecture

i3-9100F i5-12400
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9100F vs i5-12400 Cache

i3-9100F i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i3-9100F vs i5-12400 Cores

i3-9100F i5-12400
# of Cores46
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9100F vs i5-12400 Performance

i3-9100F i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier36.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i3-9100F vs i5-12400 Physical

i3-9100F i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-9100F vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments