i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100F Phenom II X2 545

Multi-Thread Performance

8988 Pts
1911 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2343 Pts
1025 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100F Phenom II X2 545

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
66.1 FPS
1080p
28.3 FPS
1440p
47.7 FPS
1440p
20.4 FPS
2160p
33.3 FPS
2160p
14.2 FPS
w1440p
43.3 FPS
w1440p
18.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
111.0 FPS
1080p
53.5 FPS
1440p
84.0 FPS
1440p
40.3 FPS
2160p
61.6 FPS
2160p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
77.3 FPS
w1440p
37.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
155.9 FPS
1080p
78.7 FPS
1440p
120.3 FPS
1440p
60.1 FPS
2160p
89.9 FPS
2160p
44.4 FPS
w1440p
111.3 FPS
w1440p
55.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
245.7 FPS
1080p
129.2 FPS
1440p
192.8 FPS
1440p
99.8 FPS
2160p
146.6 FPS
2160p
74.6 FPS
w1440p
179.2 FPS
w1440p
92.3 FPS
i3-9100F
  • The i3-9100F has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-9100F has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9100F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i3-9100F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X2 545
  • The Phenom II X2 545 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 specifications

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 Architecture

i3-9100F Phenom II X2 545
CodenameCoffee LakeCallisto
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X2 (Callisto)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHDX545WFK2DGIHDX545WFGIBOXHDX545WFK2DGMHDX545WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Jun 2009

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 Cache

i3-9100F Phenom II X2 545
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (per core)

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 Cores

i3-9100F Phenom II X2 545
# of Cores42
# of Threads42
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 Performance

i3-9100F Phenom II X2 545
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier36.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W80 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 Physical

i3-9100F Phenom II X2 545
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9100F vs Phenom II X2 545 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments