i3-7320 vs i5-11600K - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i5-11600K

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
14700 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
2992 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7320 vs i5-11600K in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i5-11600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.1 FPS
1080p
74.2 FPS
1440p
41.2 FPS
1440p
53.5 FPS
2160p
28.8 FPS
2160p
37.4 FPS
w1440p
37.4 FPS
w1440p
48.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.0 FPS
1080p
122.4 FPS
1440p
74.0 FPS
1440p
92.7 FPS
2160p
54.3 FPS
2160p
68.1 FPS
w1440p
68.1 FPS
w1440p
85.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
138.8 FPS
1080p
170.7 FPS
1440p
106.9 FPS
1440p
131.8 FPS
2160p
79.9 FPS
2160p
98.8 FPS
w1440p
98.8 FPS
w1440p
122.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
220.6 FPS
1080p
267.2 FPS
1440p
172.6 FPS
1440p
210.2 FPS
2160p
131.0 FPS
2160p
160.3 FPS
w1440p
160.3 FPS
w1440p
195.6 FPS
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-7320 vs i5-11600K specifications

i3-7320 vs i5-11600K Architecture

i3-7320 i5-11600K
CodenameKaby LakeRocket Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i5 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#SR358unknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedJan 2017Mar 16th, 2021

i3-7320 vs i5-11600K Cache

i3-7320 i5-11600K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-7320 vs i5-11600K Cores

i3-7320 i5-11600K
# of Cores26
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD Graphics 750
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs i5-11600K Features

i3-7320 i5-11600K
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i3-7320 vs i5-11600K Performance

i3-7320 i5-11600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier41.0x39.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.9 GHz
Voltageunknownvariable

i3-7320 vs i5-11600K Physical

i3-7320 i5-11600K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7320 vs i5-11600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments