i3-7320 vs i3-12100 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i3-12100

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
12603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
3340 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7320 vs i3-12100 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i3-12100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
44.3 FPS
1080p
55.1 FPS
1440p
32.0 FPS
1440p
39.7 FPS
2160p
21.8 FPS
2160p
27.1 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
35.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.8 FPS
1080p
95.0 FPS
1440p
59.5 FPS
1440p
71.7 FPS
2160p
42.7 FPS
2160p
51.5 FPS
w1440p
54.3 FPS
w1440p
65.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.3 FPS
1080p
135.0 FPS
1440p
87.1 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
2160p
63.5 FPS
2160p
76.0 FPS
w1440p
79.9 FPS
w1440p
95.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
182.4 FPS
1080p
214.8 FPS
1440p
142.1 FPS
1440p
167.8 FPS
2160p
105.2 FPS
2160p
124.9 FPS
w1440p
131.0 FPS
w1440p
154.7 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-7320 vs i3-12100 specifications

i3-7320 vs i3-12100 Architecture

i3-7320 i3-12100
CodenameKaby LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#SR358SRL62
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-7320 vs i3-12100 Cache

i3-7320 i3-12100
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-7320 vs i3-12100 Cores

i3-7320 i3-12100
# of Cores24
# of Threads48
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs i3-12100 Features

i3-7320 i3-12100

i3-7320 vs i3-12100 Performance

i3-7320 i3-12100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier41.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP51 W60 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.3 GHz

i3-7320 vs i3-12100 Physical

i3-7320 i3-12100
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-7320 vs i3-12100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments