i3-7320 vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 390 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7320 vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 390 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
54.3 FPS
1080p
63.1 FPS
1440p
39.2 FPS
1440p
45.6 FPS
2160p
27.1 FPS
2160p
31.5 FPS
w1440p
35.5 FPS
w1440p
41.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
93.8 FPS
1080p
106.7 FPS
1440p
70.9 FPS
1440p
80.8 FPS
2160p
51.5 FPS
2160p
58.7 FPS
w1440p
65.1 FPS
w1440p
74.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
133.4 FPS
1080p
150.3 FPS
1440p
102.7 FPS
1440p
116.0 FPS
2160p
76.0 FPS
2160p
86.0 FPS
w1440p
94.8 FPS
w1440p
106.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
212.5 FPS
1080p
237.4 FPS
1440p
166.2 FPS
1440p
186.4 FPS
2160p
124.9 FPS
2160p
140.4 FPS
w1440p
154.0 FPS
w1440p
172.6 FPS
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-10100 specifications

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Cache

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Cores

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Features

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Performance

    i3-7320 i3-10100
    Frequency4.1 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP51 W65 W

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Physical

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments