i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 Phenom II X4 B97

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
3884 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
1107 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 Phenom II X4 B97

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
44.3 FPS
1080p
26.1 FPS
1440p
32.0 FPS
1440p
18.8 FPS
2160p
21.8 FPS
2160p
12.8 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
16.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.8 FPS
1080p
49.9 FPS
1440p
59.5 FPS
1440p
37.5 FPS
2160p
42.7 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
w1440p
54.3 FPS
w1440p
34.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.3 FPS
1080p
73.7 FPS
1440p
87.1 FPS
1440p
56.2 FPS
2160p
63.5 FPS
2160p
40.7 FPS
w1440p
79.9 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
182.4 FPS
1080p
121.3 FPS
1440p
142.1 FPS
1440p
93.5 FPS
2160p
105.2 FPS
2160p
68.6 FPS
w1440p
131.0 FPS
w1440p
85.9 FPS
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-7320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 B97
  • The Phenom II X4 B97 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X4 B97 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Phenom II X4 B97 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.

Compare i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 specifications

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Architecture

i3-7320 Phenom II X4 B97
CodenameKaby LakeDeneb
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Phenom II X4 (Deneb)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#SR358HDXB97WFK4DGM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedJan 2017May 2010

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Cache

i3-7320 Phenom II X4 B97
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Cores

i3-7320 Phenom II X4 B97
# of Cores24
# of Threads44
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Features

i3-7320 Phenom II X4 B97
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Performance

i3-7320 Phenom II X4 B97
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier41.0x16.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP51 W95 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltageunknown1.425 V

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Physical

i3-7320 Phenom II X4 B97
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax65°Cunknown

Compare i3-7320 vs Phenom II X4 B97 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments