i3-7300 vs i9-14900K - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7300 i9-14900K

Multi-Thread Performance

6436 Pts
41458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2317 Pts
5619 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7300 vs i9-14900K in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7300 i9-14900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.3 FPS
1080p
81.5 FPS
1440p
40.6 FPS
1440p
55.9 FPS
2160p
28.4 FPS
2160p
39.0 FPS
w1440p
36.9 FPS
w1440p
50.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.8 FPS
1080p
132.6 FPS
1440p
73.1 FPS
1440p
96.2 FPS
2160p
53.7 FPS
2160p
70.6 FPS
w1440p
67.3 FPS
w1440p
88.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
137.3 FPS
1080p
183.7 FPS
1440p
105.6 FPS
1440p
136.5 FPS
2160p
79.0 FPS
2160p
102.3 FPS
w1440p
97.8 FPS
w1440p
126.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
218.3 FPS
1080p
285.8 FPS
1440p
170.7 FPS
1440p
217.1 FPS
2160p
129.5 FPS
2160p
165.5 FPS
w1440p
158.7 FPS
w1440p
202.2 FPS
i3-7300
  • The i3-7300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-14900K
  • The i9-14900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-14900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-7300 vs i9-14900K specifications

i3-7300 vs i9-14900K Architecture

i3-7300 i9-14900K
CodenameKaby LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i3-7300 vs i9-14900K Cache

i3-7300 i9-14900K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)36 MB (shared)

i3-7300 vs i9-14900K Cores

i3-7300 i9-14900K

i3-7300 vs i9-14900K Features

i3-7300 i9-14900K

i3-7300 vs i9-14900K Performance

i3-7300 i9-14900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier40.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 6 GHz

i3-7300 vs i9-14900K Physical

i3-7300 i9-14900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-7300 vs i9-14900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments