i3-7300 vs i9-12900K - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1070 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7300 i9-12900K

Multi-Thread Performance

6436 Pts
28791 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2317 Pts
3903 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7300 vs i9-12900K in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1070 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7300 i9-12900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
68.7 FPS
1080p
91.1 FPS
1440p
49.7 FPS
1440p
60.0 FPS
2160p
34.3 FPS
2160p
41.4 FPS
w1440p
44.9 FPS
w1440p
54.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
114.7 FPS
1080p
145.7 FPS
1440p
87.0 FPS
1440p
102.2 FPS
2160p
63.2 FPS
2160p
74.4 FPS
w1440p
79.7 FPS
w1440p
93.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
160.7 FPS
1080p
200.2 FPS
1440p
124.3 FPS
1440p
144.4 FPS
2160p
92.1 FPS
2160p
107.3 FPS
w1440p
114.6 FPS
w1440p
133.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
252.7 FPS
1080p
309.4 FPS
1440p
198.9 FPS
1440p
228.8 FPS
2160p
150.0 FPS
2160p
173.2 FPS
w1440p
184.2 FPS
w1440p
212.5 FPS
i3-7300
  • The i3-7300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-7300 vs i9-12900K specifications

i3-7300 vs i9-12900K Architecture

i3-7300 i9-12900K
CodenameKaby LakeAlder Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
Part#SR359unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-7300 vs i9-12900K Cache

i3-7300 i9-12900K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)14MB (shared)
Cache L34MB (shared)30MB (shared)

i3-7300 vs i9-12900K Cores

i3-7300 i9-12900K
# of Cores216
# of Threads424
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7300 vs i9-12900K Features

i3-7300 i9-12900K

i3-7300 vs i9-12900K Performance

i3-7300 i9-12900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier40.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5.2 GHz

i3-7300 vs i9-12900K Physical

i3-7300 i9-12900K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1700
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7300 vs i9-12900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments