i3-12300 vs i7-10700K - Need For Speed: Payback R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i7-10700K

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
18919 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2991 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs i7-10700K in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i7-10700K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.6 FPS
1080p
85.4 FPS
1440p
57.7 FPS
1440p
58.5 FPS
2160p
40.0 FPS
2160p
40.5 FPS
w1440p
52.3 FPS
w1440p
53.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
134.1 FPS
1080p
137.9 FPS
1440p
98.8 FPS
1440p
100.0 FPS
2160p
72.2 FPS
2160p
73.0 FPS
w1440p
90.9 FPS
w1440p
91.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
185.6 FPS
1080p
190.5 FPS
1440p
140.0 FPS
1440p
141.5 FPS
2160p
104.4 FPS
2160p
105.4 FPS
w1440p
129.5 FPS
w1440p
130.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
288.6 FPS
1080p
295.5 FPS
1440p
222.3 FPS
1440p
224.6 FPS
2160p
168.8 FPS
2160p
170.4 FPS
w1440p
206.6 FPS
w1440p
208.7 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-10700K
  • The i7-10700K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i7-10700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-10700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-10700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i7-10700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12300 vs i7-10700K specifications

i3-12300 vs i7-10700K Architecture

i3-12300 i7-10700K
CodenameAlder Lake-SComet Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i7 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL61unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12300 vs i7-10700K Cache

i3-12300 i7-10700K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i7-10700K Cores

i3-12300 i7-10700K
# of Cores48
# of Threads816
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i7-10700K Performance

i3-12300 i7-10700K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier35.0x38.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.1 GHz

i3-12300 vs i7-10700K Physical

i3-12300 i7-10700K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200

Compare i3-12300 vs i7-10700K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments