i3-12300 vs i5-11600K - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 960 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i5-11600K

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
14700 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2992 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs i5-11600K in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 960 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i5-11600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.9 FPS
1080p
44.3 FPS
1440p
30.0 FPS
1440p
30.5 FPS
2160p
20.7 FPS
2160p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
27.2 FPS
w1440p
27.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.7 FPS
1080p
78.8 FPS
1440p
56.3 FPS
1440p
57.1 FPS
2160p
40.8 FPS
2160p
41.3 FPS
w1440p
51.7 FPS
w1440p
52.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
110.4 FPS
1080p
113.3 FPS
1440p
82.6 FPS
1440p
83.7 FPS
2160p
60.8 FPS
2160p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
76.2 FPS
w1440p
76.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
178.0 FPS
1080p
182.4 FPS
1440p
135.2 FPS
1440p
136.9 FPS
2160p
101.0 FPS
2160p
102.1 FPS
w1440p
125.2 FPS
w1440p
126.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-11600K specifications

i3-12300 vs i5-11600K Architecture

i3-12300 i5-11600K
CodenameAlder Lake-SRocket Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL61unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12300 vs i5-11600K Cache

i3-12300 i5-11600K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i5-11600K Cores

i3-12300 i5-11600K
# of Cores46
# of Threads812
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 750
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i5-11600K Performance

i3-12300 i5-11600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier35.0x39.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.9 GHz

i3-12300 vs i5-11600K Physical

i3-12300 i5-11600K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-11600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments