i3-12300 vs i3-6100 - Need For Speed: Payback R7 370 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-6100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
5491 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2107 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs i3-6100 in Need For Speed: Payback using R7 370 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-6100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.2 FPS
1080p
19.8 FPS
1440p
22.5 FPS
1440p
14.3 FPS
2160p
15.6 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
w1440p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
12.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.9 FPS
1080p
39.2 FPS
1440p
43.8 FPS
1440p
29.5 FPS
2160p
31.8 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
w1440p
40.3 FPS
w1440p
26.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.5 FPS
1080p
58.6 FPS
1440p
65.2 FPS
1440p
44.7 FPS
2160p
48.1 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
60.1 FPS
w1440p
41.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
142.8 FPS
1080p
97.5 FPS
1440p
107.9 FPS
1440p
75.0 FPS
2160p
80.5 FPS
2160p
55.6 FPS
w1440p
99.8 FPS
w1440p
69.0 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-6100
  • The i3-6100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-6100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-6100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-6100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-6100
CodenameAlder Lake-SSkylake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Skylake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL61SR2HG
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12300 vs i3-6100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-6100
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i3-6100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-6100
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 530
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i3-6100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-6100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier35.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs i3-6100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-6100
Die Size163 mm²150 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-6100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments