i3-12300 vs i3-4340 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-4340

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
5237 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2085 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs i3-4340 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-4340

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.6 FPS
1080p
49.7 FPS
1440p
57.7 FPS
1440p
35.9 FPS
2160p
40.0 FPS
2160p
24.8 FPS
w1440p
52.3 FPS
w1440p
32.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
134.1 FPS
1080p
87.0 FPS
1440p
98.8 FPS
1440p
65.8 FPS
2160p
72.2 FPS
2160p
47.7 FPS
w1440p
90.9 FPS
w1440p
60.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
185.6 FPS
1080p
124.3 FPS
1440p
140.0 FPS
1440p
95.6 FPS
2160p
104.4 FPS
2160p
70.6 FPS
w1440p
129.5 FPS
w1440p
88.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
288.6 FPS
1080p
198.9 FPS
1440p
222.3 FPS
1440p
155.3 FPS
2160p
168.8 FPS
2160p
116.5 FPS
w1440p
206.6 FPS
w1440p
143.9 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-4340
  • The i3-4340 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-4340 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-4340 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-4340 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-4340
CodenameAlder Lake-SHaswell
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61SR1NL
Production StatusActiveunknown

i3-12300 vs i3-4340 Cache

i3-12300 i3-4340
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i3-4340 Cores

i3-12300 i3-4340
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 4600
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i3-4340 Performance

i3-12300 i3-4340
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier35.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W54 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs i3-4340 Physical

i3-12300 i3-4340
Die Size163 mm²177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1150

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-4340 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments