i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.5 FPS
1080p
83.0 FPS
1440p
61.2 FPS
1440p
59.9 FPS
2160p
42.4 FPS
2160p
41.5 FPS
w1440p
55.4 FPS
w1440p
54.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
140.8 FPS
1080p
134.6 FPS
1440p
103.9 FPS
1440p
102.1 FPS
2160p
75.9 FPS
2160p
74.5 FPS
w1440p
95.5 FPS
w1440p
93.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
194.1 FPS
1080p
186.3 FPS
1440p
146.7 FPS
1440p
144.2 FPS
2160p
109.4 FPS
2160p
107.5 FPS
w1440p
135.5 FPS
w1440p
133.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
300.7 FPS
1080p
289.6 FPS
1440p
232.2 FPS
1440p
228.5 FPS
2160p
176.4 FPS
2160p
173.6 FPS
w1440p
215.7 FPS
w1440p
212.2 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments