i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Phenom X3 8550

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
1930 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
741 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Phenom X3 8550

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.6 FPS
1080p
28.0 FPS
1440p
57.7 FPS
1440p
20.2 FPS
2160p
40.0 FPS
2160p
14.0 FPS
w1440p
52.3 FPS
w1440p
18.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
134.1 FPS
1080p
53.0 FPS
1440p
98.8 FPS
1440p
39.9 FPS
2160p
72.2 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
w1440p
90.9 FPS
w1440p
36.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
185.6 FPS
1080p
78.1 FPS
1440p
140.0 FPS
1440p
59.6 FPS
2160p
104.4 FPS
2160p
43.9 FPS
w1440p
129.5 FPS
w1440p
54.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
288.6 FPS
1080p
128.1 FPS
1440p
222.3 FPS
1440p
99.0 FPS
2160p
168.8 FPS
2160p
73.8 FPS
w1440p
206.6 FPS
w1440p
91.5 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom X3 8550
  • The Phenom X3 8550 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 specifications

i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 Architecture

i3-12300 Phenom X3 8550
CodenameAlder Lake-SToliman
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom X3 (Toliman)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelunknown
Part#SRL61HD8550WCJ3BGH
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 Cache

i3-12300 Phenom X3 8550
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)2MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 Cores

i3-12300 Phenom X3 8550
# of Cores43
# of Threads83
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 Performance

i3-12300 Phenom X3 8550
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplier35.0x11.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 Physical

i3-12300 Phenom X3 8550
Die Size163 mm²285 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm65 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM2+

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom X3 8550 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments