i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 - Need For Speed: Payback R7 370 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
2442 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
907 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 in Need For Speed: Payback using R7 370 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.2 FPS
1080p
13.8 FPS
1440p
22.5 FPS
1440p
10.0 FPS
2160p
15.6 FPS
2160p
6.9 FPS
w1440p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
9.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.9 FPS
1080p
28.6 FPS
1440p
43.8 FPS
1440p
21.5 FPS
2160p
31.8 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
w1440p
40.3 FPS
w1440p
19.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.5 FPS
1080p
43.4 FPS
1440p
65.2 FPS
1440p
33.0 FPS
2160p
48.1 FPS
2160p
24.1 FPS
w1440p
60.1 FPS
w1440p
30.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
142.8 FPS
1080p
72.9 FPS
1440p
107.9 FPS
1440p
56.1 FPS
2160p
80.5 FPS
2160p
41.2 FPS
w1440p
99.8 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X3 710
  • The Phenom II X3 710 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 specifications

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Architecture

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
CodenameAlder Lake-SHeka
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61HDX710WFK3DGIHDX710WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Cache

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Cores

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
# of Cores43
# of Threads83
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Performance

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier35.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Physical

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
Die Size163 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments