i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Athlon II X3 440

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
2571 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1015 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Athlon II X3 440

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.4 FPS
1080p
23.5 FPS
1440p
41.3 FPS
1440p
16.9 FPS
2160p
28.3 FPS
2160p
11.6 FPS
w1440p
37.3 FPS
w1440p
15.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.4 FPS
1080p
45.5 FPS
1440p
74.2 FPS
1440p
34.1 FPS
2160p
53.5 FPS
2160p
24.5 FPS
w1440p
68.0 FPS
w1440p
31.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.4 FPS
1080p
67.6 FPS
1440p
107.1 FPS
1440p
51.4 FPS
2160p
78.7 FPS
2160p
37.4 FPS
w1440p
98.6 FPS
w1440p
47.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
221.4 FPS
1080p
111.6 FPS
1440p
172.9 FPS
1440p
85.9 FPS
2160p
129.2 FPS
2160p
63.3 FPS
w1440p
160.0 FPS
w1440p
79.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 440
  • The Athlon II X3 440 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 specifications

i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 Architecture

i3-12300 Athlon II X3 440
CodenameAlder Lake-SRana
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61ADX440WFK32GIADX440WFGIBOXADX440WFK32GMADX440WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 Cache

i3-12300 Athlon II X3 440
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)

i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 Cores

i3-12300 Athlon II X3 440
# of Cores43
# of Threads83
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance

i3-12300 Athlon II X3 440
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 Physical

i3-12300 Athlon II X3 440
Die Size163 mm²169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12300 vs Athlon II X3 440 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments