i3-12100 vs i5-9400F - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i5-9400F

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
12212 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2387 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i5-9400F in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i5-9400F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
138.4 FPS
1080p
137.1 FPS
1440p
100.6 FPS
1440p
99.6 FPS
2160p
72.5 FPS
2160p
71.8 FPS
w1440p
92.6 FPS
w1440p
91.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
206.8 FPS
1080p
205.2 FPS
1440p
158.4 FPS
1440p
157.0 FPS
2160p
120.1 FPS
2160p
119.1 FPS
w1440p
147.7 FPS
w1440p
146.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
275.3 FPS
1080p
273.3 FPS
1440p
216.1 FPS
1440p
214.5 FPS
2160p
167.6 FPS
2160p
166.4 FPS
w1440p
202.8 FPS
w1440p
201.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
412.1 FPS
1080p
409.5 FPS
1440p
331.6 FPS
1440p
329.3 FPS
2160p
262.8 FPS
2160p
260.9 FPS
w1440p
312.9 FPS
w1440p
310.8 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-9400F
  • The i5-9400F has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-9400F has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-9400F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-9400F specifications

i3-12100 vs i5-9400F Architecture

i3-12100 i5-9400F
CodenameAlder Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SRF6M
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i5-9400F Cache

i3-12100 i5-9400F
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)9MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i5-9400F Cores

i3-12100 i5-9400F
# of Cores46
# of Threads86
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i5-9400F Performance

i3-12100 i5-9400F
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier33.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.1 GHz

i3-12100 vs i5-9400F Physical

i3-12100 i5-9400F
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-9400F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments