i3-12100 vs i3-6100 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-6100

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
5491 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2107 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i3-6100 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-6100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
92.4 FPS
1080p
54.1 FPS
1440p
66.5 FPS
1440p
38.9 FPS
2160p
45.6 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
w1440p
60.0 FPS
w1440p
35.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
147.4 FPS
1080p
93.6 FPS
1440p
111.6 FPS
1440p
70.5 FPS
2160p
80.8 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
102.2 FPS
w1440p
64.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
202.4 FPS
1080p
133.0 FPS
1440p
156.6 FPS
1440p
102.0 FPS
2160p
116.0 FPS
2160p
75.1 FPS
w1440p
144.4 FPS
w1440p
93.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
312.5 FPS
1080p
211.9 FPS
1440p
246.8 FPS
1440p
165.2 FPS
2160p
186.4 FPS
2160p
123.4 FPS
w1440p
228.8 FPS
w1440p
152.7 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-6100
  • The i3-6100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-6100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-6100 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-6100 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-6100
CodenameAlder Lake-SSkylake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Skylake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SR2HG
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-6100 Cache

i3-12100 i3-6100
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-6100 Cores

i3-12100 i3-6100
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 530
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-6100 Performance

i3-12100 i3-6100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-6100 Physical

i3-12100 i3-6100
Die Size163 mm²150 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-6100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments