i3-12100 vs i3-3240 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-3240

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
4310 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1808 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i3-3240 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-3240

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
138.4 FPS
1080p
67.5 FPS
1440p
100.6 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
2160p
72.5 FPS
2160p
35.4 FPS
w1440p
92.6 FPS
w1440p
45.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
206.8 FPS
1080p
113.0 FPS
1440p
158.4 FPS
1440p
86.1 FPS
2160p
120.1 FPS
2160p
65.0 FPS
w1440p
147.7 FPS
w1440p
80.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
275.3 FPS
1080p
158.5 FPS
1440p
216.1 FPS
1440p
123.1 FPS
2160p
167.6 FPS
2160p
94.5 FPS
w1440p
202.8 FPS
w1440p
115.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
412.1 FPS
1080p
249.5 FPS
1440p
331.6 FPS
1440p
197.1 FPS
2160p
262.8 FPS
2160p
153.7 FPS
w1440p
312.9 FPS
w1440p
185.2 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-3240
  • The i3-3240 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-3240 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-3240 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-3240 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-3240
CodenameAlder Lake-SIvy Bridge
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Ivy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62SR0RH
Production StatusActiveunknown

i3-12100 vs i3-3240 Cache

i3-12100 i3-3240
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-3240 Cores

i3-12100 i3-3240
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 2500
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-3240 Performance

i3-12100 i3-3240
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier33.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W55 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-3240 Physical

i3-12100 i3-3240
Die Size163 mm²94 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-3240 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments