i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.8 FPS
1080p
41.6 FPS
1440p
30.7 FPS
1440p
29.9 FPS
2160p
21.0 FPS
2160p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
26.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.5 FPS
1080p
74.7 FPS
1440p
57.4 FPS
1440p
56.1 FPS
2160p
41.3 FPS
2160p
40.3 FPS
w1440p
52.5 FPS
w1440p
51.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
110.2 FPS
1080p
107.7 FPS
1440p
84.2 FPS
1440p
82.4 FPS
2160p
61.6 FPS
2160p
60.1 FPS
w1440p
77.4 FPS
w1440p
75.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
177.7 FPS
1080p
173.9 FPS
1440p
137.6 FPS
1440p
134.8 FPS
2160p
102.1 FPS
2160p
99.8 FPS
w1440p
127.0 FPS
w1440p
124.2 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments