i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 M270X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 M270X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.8 FPS
1080p
27.2 FPS
1440p
18.4 FPS
1440p
18.2 FPS
2160p
12.8 FPS
2160p
12.7 FPS
w1440p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
16.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
52.7 FPS
1080p
51.7 FPS
1440p
36.8 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
2160p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
33.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
77.6 FPS
1080p
76.2 FPS
1440p
55.2 FPS
1440p
54.7 FPS
2160p
40.7 FPS
2160p
40.4 FPS
w1440p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
50.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
127.4 FPS
1080p
125.2 FPS
1440p
91.9 FPS
1440p
91.1 FPS
2160p
68.6 FPS
2160p
68.2 FPS
w1440p
85.0 FPS
w1440p
84.2 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments