i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Phenom II X4 820

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
3409 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
978 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Phenom II X4 820

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.8 FPS
1080p
40.0 FPS
1440p
61.0 FPS
1440p
28.9 FPS
2160p
42.3 FPS
2160p
20.0 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
26.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.8 FPS
1080p
72.2 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
1440p
54.5 FPS
2160p
75.7 FPS
2160p
39.6 FPS
w1440p
95.2 FPS
w1440p
50.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
192.9 FPS
1080p
104.4 FPS
1440p
146.3 FPS
1440p
80.1 FPS
2160p
109.2 FPS
2160p
59.1 FPS
w1440p
135.2 FPS
w1440p
73.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
299.0 FPS
1080p
168.8 FPS
1440p
231.6 FPS
1440p
131.3 FPS
2160p
176.1 FPS
2160p
98.2 FPS
w1440p
215.1 FPS
w1440p
121.6 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 820
  • The Phenom II X4 820 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 specifications

i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 Architecture

i3-12100 Phenom II X4 820
CodenameAlder Lake-SDeneb
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X4 (Deneb)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62HDX820WFK4FGIHDX820WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 Cache

i3-12100 Phenom II X4 820
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 Cores

i3-12100 Phenom II X4 820
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 Performance

i3-12100 Phenom II X4 820
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier33.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 Physical

i3-12100 Phenom II X4 820
Die Size163 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12100 vs Phenom II X4 820 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments