i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Athlon II X3 445

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
2573 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1049 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 445

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.8 FPS
1080p
40.0 FPS
1440p
61.0 FPS
1440p
28.9 FPS
2160p
42.3 FPS
2160p
20.0 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
26.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.8 FPS
1080p
72.2 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
1440p
54.5 FPS
2160p
75.7 FPS
2160p
39.6 FPS
w1440p
95.2 FPS
w1440p
50.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
192.9 FPS
1080p
104.4 FPS
1440p
146.3 FPS
1440p
80.1 FPS
2160p
109.2 FPS
2160p
59.1 FPS
w1440p
135.2 FPS
w1440p
73.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
299.0 FPS
1080p
168.8 FPS
1440p
231.6 FPS
1440p
131.3 FPS
2160p
176.1 FPS
2160p
98.2 FPS
w1440p
215.1 FPS
w1440p
121.6 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 445
  • The Athlon II X3 445 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 specifications

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 Architecture

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 445
CodenameAlder Lake-SRana
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62ADX445WFK32GMADX445WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 Cache

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 445
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 Cores

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 445
# of Cores43
# of Threads83
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 Performance

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 445
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier33.0x15.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 Physical

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 445
Die Size163 mm²169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 445 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments