i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Athlon II X2 240

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
1642 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
938 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 240

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.8 FPS
1080p
35.0 FPS
1440p
61.0 FPS
1440p
25.3 FPS
2160p
42.3 FPS
2160p
17.5 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
22.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.8 FPS
1080p
64.3 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
1440p
48.6 FPS
2160p
75.7 FPS
2160p
35.2 FPS
w1440p
95.2 FPS
w1440p
44.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
192.9 FPS
1080p
93.7 FPS
1440p
146.3 FPS
1440p
71.8 FPS
2160p
109.2 FPS
2160p
52.9 FPS
w1440p
135.2 FPS
w1440p
66.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
299.0 FPS
1080p
152.3 FPS
1440p
231.6 FPS
1440p
118.3 FPS
2160p
176.1 FPS
2160p
88.3 FPS
w1440p
215.1 FPS
w1440p
109.4 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 240
  • The Athlon II X2 240 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 specifications

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 Architecture

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 240
CodenameAlder Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62ADX240OCK23GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 Cache

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 240
Cache L180K (per core)256K
Cache L21.25MB (per core)2MB

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 Cores

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 240
# of Cores42
# of Threads82
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 Performance

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 240
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier33.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 Physical

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 240
Die Size163 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 240 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments