i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Athlon II X2 220

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
1634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
933 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 220

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
81.9 FPS
1080p
33.0 FPS
1440p
57.5 FPS
1440p
23.8 FPS
2160p
39.8 FPS
2160p
16.5 FPS
w1440p
52.1 FPS
w1440p
21.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
133.1 FPS
1080p
61.1 FPS
1440p
98.6 FPS
1440p
46.0 FPS
2160p
71.9 FPS
2160p
33.4 FPS
w1440p
90.6 FPS
w1440p
42.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
184.4 FPS
1080p
89.3 FPS
1440p
139.6 FPS
1440p
68.3 FPS
2160p
104.0 FPS
2160p
50.4 FPS
w1440p
129.1 FPS
w1440p
63.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
286.8 FPS
1080p
145.6 FPS
1440p
221.7 FPS
1440p
112.8 FPS
2160p
168.1 FPS
2160p
84.2 FPS
w1440p
206.0 FPS
w1440p
104.4 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 220
  • The Athlon II X2 220 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 specifications

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 Architecture

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 220
CodenameAlder Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62ADX220OCK22GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 Cache

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 220
Cache L180K (per core)128K
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 Cores

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 220
# of Cores42
# of Threads82
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 Performance

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 220
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier33.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 Physical

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 220
Die Size163 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 220 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments