i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 - Need For Speed: Heat Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Athlon II X2 260

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
1873 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
1074 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 in Need For Speed: Heat using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 260

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.1 FPS
1080p
15.5 FPS
1440p
30.8 FPS
1440p
12.2 FPS
2160p
19.0 FPS
2160p
7.5 FPS
w1440p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
10.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.8 FPS
1080p
31.6 FPS
1440p
57.6 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
2160p
37.8 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
50.7 FPS
w1440p
22.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
102.5 FPS
1080p
47.8 FPS
1440p
84.4 FPS
1440p
39.1 FPS
2160p
56.7 FPS
2160p
25.8 FPS
w1440p
74.8 FPS
w1440p
34.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
165.8 FPS
1080p
80.1 FPS
1440p
138.0 FPS
1440p
66.0 FPS
2160p
94.3 FPS
2160p
44.2 FPS
w1440p
123.1 FPS
w1440p
58.8 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 260
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 specifications

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 Architecture

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 260
CodenameAlder Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YADX260OCK23GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 Cache

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 260
Cache L180K (per core)128K
Cache L21.25MB (per core)1MB

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 Cores

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 260
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 Performance

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 260
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier25.0x16.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 Physical

i5-12400 Athlon II X2 260
Die Size163 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i5-12400 vs Athlon II X2 260 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments