i5-11600K vs i3-12100 - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K i3-12100

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
12603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
3340 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i5-11600K vs i3-12100 in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K i3-12100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
50.1 FPS
1080p
47.9 FPS
1440p
38.7 FPS
1440p
37.6 FPS
2160p
24.5 FPS
2160p
23.8 FPS
w1440p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
32.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.6 FPS
1080p
84.3 FPS
1440p
70.2 FPS
1440p
68.4 FPS
2160p
47.2 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
w1440p
62.4 FPS
w1440p
60.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
125.1 FPS
1080p
120.7 FPS
1440p
101.6 FPS
1440p
99.3 FPS
2160p
69.9 FPS
2160p
68.3 FPS
w1440p
91.0 FPS
w1440p
88.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
200.1 FPS
1080p
193.5 FPS
1440p
164.5 FPS
1440p
161.0 FPS
2160p
115.4 FPS
2160p
112.8 FPS
w1440p
148.3 FPS
w1440p
144.9 FPS
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-11600K vs i3-12100 specifications

i5-11600K vs i3-12100 Architecture

i5-11600K i3-12100
CodenameRocket LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL62
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-11600K vs i3-12100 Cache

i5-11600K i3-12100
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-11600K vs i3-12100 Cores

i5-11600K i3-12100
# of Cores64
# of Threads128
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11600K vs i3-12100 Features

i5-11600K i3-12100

i5-11600K vs i3-12100 Notes

i5-11600K i3-12100

i5-11600K vs i3-12100 Performance

i5-11600K i3-12100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier39.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i5-11600K vs i3-12100 Physical

i5-11600K i3-12100
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i5-11600K vs i3-12100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments