i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
3244 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
990 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
50.1 FPS
1080p
20.7 FPS
1440p
38.7 FPS
1440p
16.2 FPS
2160p
24.5 FPS
2160p
10.3 FPS
w1440p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
14.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.6 FPS
1080p
40.8 FPS
1440p
70.2 FPS
1440p
32.9 FPS
2160p
47.2 FPS
2160p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
62.4 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
125.1 FPS
1080p
60.8 FPS
1440p
101.6 FPS
1440p
49.6 FPS
2160p
69.9 FPS
2160p
33.9 FPS
w1440p
91.0 FPS
w1440p
44.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
200.1 FPS
1080p
101.0 FPS
1440p
164.5 FPS
1440p
83.0 FPS
2160p
115.4 FPS
2160p
57.4 FPS
w1440p
148.3 FPS
w1440p
74.6 FPS
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-11600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X4 635
  • The Athlon II X4 635 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 specifications

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 Architecture

i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635
CodenameRocket LakePropus
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Athlon II X4 (Propus)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX635WFK42GIADX635WFGIBOXADX635WFK42GMADX635WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Jan 2010

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 Cache

i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 Cores

i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 Features

i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 Notes

i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 Performance

i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier39.0x14.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 Physical

i5-11600K Athlon II X4 635
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-11600K vs Athlon II X4 635 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments