i5-10400 vs i3-9320 - Need For Speed: Heat RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-9320

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
10144 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
2552 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i5-10400 vs i3-9320 in Need For Speed: Heat using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-9320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.2 FPS
1080p
149.7 FPS
1440p
130.4 FPS
1440p
120.4 FPS
2160p
85.8 FPS
2160p
79.2 FPS
w1440p
115.7 FPS
w1440p
106.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
236.0 FPS
1080p
220.8 FPS
1440p
196.8 FPS
1440p
184.1 FPS
2160p
138.5 FPS
2160p
129.4 FPS
w1440p
178.1 FPS
w1440p
166.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
309.7 FPS
1080p
291.8 FPS
1440p
263.2 FPS
1440p
247.8 FPS
2160p
191.2 FPS
2160p
179.6 FPS
w1440p
240.5 FPS
w1440p
226.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
457.2 FPS
1080p
434.0 FPS
1440p
396.0 FPS
1440p
375.3 FPS
2160p
296.5 FPS
2160p
280.0 FPS
w1440p
365.2 FPS
w1440p
345.7 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-9320 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-9320 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-9320
CodenameComet LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Apr 2019

i5-10400 vs i3-9320 Cache

i5-10400 i3-9320
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-9320 Cores

i5-10400 i3-9320
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-9320 Features

i5-10400 i3-9320

i5-10400 vs i3-9320 Notes

i5-10400 i3-9320

i5-10400 vs i3-9320 Performance

i5-10400 i3-9320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier29.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W62 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i5-10400 vs i3-9320 Physical

i5-10400 i3-9320
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-9320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments