i5-10400 vs i3-7320 - Need For Speed: Heat RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-7320

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
6541 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
2364 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 in Need For Speed: Heat using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-7320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.2 FPS
1080p
128.2 FPS
1440p
130.4 FPS
1440p
103.1 FPS
2160p
85.8 FPS
2160p
67.8 FPS
w1440p
115.7 FPS
w1440p
91.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
236.0 FPS
1080p
194.0 FPS
1440p
196.8 FPS
1440p
161.7 FPS
2160p
138.5 FPS
2160p
113.4 FPS
w1440p
178.1 FPS
w1440p
146.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
309.7 FPS
1080p
259.9 FPS
1440p
263.2 FPS
1440p
220.2 FPS
2160p
191.2 FPS
2160p
159.0 FPS
w1440p
240.5 FPS
w1440p
200.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
457.2 FPS
1080p
391.5 FPS
1440p
396.0 FPS
1440p
337.3 FPS
2160p
296.5 FPS
2160p
250.3 FPS
w1440p
365.2 FPS
w1440p
310.1 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-7320 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-7320
CodenameComet LakeKaby Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR358
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2017

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Cache

i5-10400 i3-7320
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Cores

i5-10400 i3-7320
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630Intel HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Features

i5-10400 i3-7320
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Notes

i5-10400 i3-7320

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Performance

i5-10400 i3-7320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier29.0x41.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Physical

i5-10400 i3-7320
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C65°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-7320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments