i3-9100F vs i9-12900K - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 650 Ti Boost - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100F i9-12900K

Multi-Thread Performance

8988 Pts
28791 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2343 Pts
3903 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-9100F vs i9-12900K in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 650 Ti Boost - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100F i9-12900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
20.4 FPS
1080p
23.3 FPS
1440p
15.1 FPS
1440p
16.0 FPS
2160p
9.6 FPS
2160p
10.1 FPS
w1440p
13.2 FPS
w1440p
14.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.3 FPS
1080p
45.2 FPS
1440p
30.9 FPS
1440p
32.5 FPS
2160p
20.8 FPS
2160p
21.7 FPS
w1440p
27.5 FPS
w1440p
28.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
60.1 FPS
1080p
67.1 FPS
1440p
46.8 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
2160p
31.9 FPS
2160p
33.3 FPS
w1440p
41.8 FPS
w1440p
43.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.8 FPS
1080p
110.9 FPS
1440p
78.4 FPS
1440p
82.2 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
2160p
56.5 FPS
w1440p
70.3 FPS
w1440p
73.8 FPS
i3-9100F
  • The i3-9100F has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9100F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-9100F vs i9-12900K specifications

i3-9100F vs i9-12900K Architecture

i3-9100F i9-12900K
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9100F vs i9-12900K Cache

i3-9100F i9-12900K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)14MB (shared)
Cache L36MB (shared)30MB (shared)

i3-9100F vs i9-12900K Cores

i3-9100F i9-12900K
# of Cores416
# of Threads424
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9100F vs i9-12900K Performance

i3-9100F i9-12900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier36.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzup to 5.2 GHz

i3-9100F vs i9-12900K Physical

i3-9100F i9-12900K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1700
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9100F vs i9-12900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments