i3-7320 vs i7-12700K - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i7-12700K

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
23836 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
3768 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-7320 vs i7-12700K in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i7-12700K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
41.3 FPS
1440p
24.1 FPS
1440p
32.1 FPS
2160p
15.2 FPS
2160p
20.2 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
28.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
74.2 FPS
1440p
46.5 FPS
1440p
59.7 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
2160p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
41.3 FPS
w1440p
53.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
107.1 FPS
1440p
69.0 FPS
1440p
87.3 FPS
2160p
47.0 FPS
2160p
59.6 FPS
w1440p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
78.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
172.9 FPS
1440p
113.9 FPS
1440p
142.5 FPS
2160p
78.8 FPS
2160p
99.0 FPS
w1440p
102.1 FPS
w1440p
128.1 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i7-12700K
  • The i7-12700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-12700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-12700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i7-12700K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-7320 vs i7-12700K specifications

i3-7320 vs i7-12700K Architecture

i3-7320 i7-12700K
CodenameKaby LakeAlder Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i7 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
Part#SR358unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-7320 vs i7-12700K Cache

i3-7320 i7-12700K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)12MB (shared)
Cache L34MB (shared)25MB (shared)

i3-7320 vs i7-12700K Cores

i3-7320 i7-12700K
# of Cores212
# of Threads420
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs i7-12700K Features

i3-7320 i7-12700K

i3-7320 vs i7-12700K Performance

i3-7320 i7-12700K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier41.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5 GHz

i3-7320 vs i7-12700K Physical

i3-7320 i7-12700K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1700
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7320 vs i7-12700K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments