i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 Phenom X3 8550

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
1930 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
741 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 Phenom X3 8550

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
10.8 FPS
1440p
24.1 FPS
1440p
8.6 FPS
2160p
15.2 FPS
2160p
5.4 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
7.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
23.0 FPS
1440p
46.5 FPS
1440p
18.8 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
2160p
12.4 FPS
w1440p
41.3 FPS
w1440p
16.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
35.3 FPS
1440p
69.0 FPS
1440p
29.1 FPS
2160p
47.0 FPS
2160p
19.5 FPS
w1440p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
25.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
59.7 FPS
1440p
113.9 FPS
1440p
49.5 FPS
2160p
78.8 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
102.1 FPS
w1440p
44.2 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-7320 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-7320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom X3 8550
  • The Phenom X3 8550 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom X3 8550 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.

Compare i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 specifications

i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 Architecture

i3-7320 Phenom X3 8550
CodenameKaby LakeToliman
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Phenom X3 (Toliman)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4unknown
Part#SR358HD8550WCJ3BGH
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedJan 2017Apr 2008

i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 Cache

i3-7320 Phenom X3 8550
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)2MB (shared)

i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 Cores

i3-7320 Phenom X3 8550
# of Cores23
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 Features

i3-7320 Phenom X3 8550
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit CnQ AMD-V HT3.0

i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 Performance

i3-7320 Phenom X3 8550
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplier41.0x11.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP51 W95 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltageunknown1.25 V

i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 Physical

i3-7320 Phenom X3 8550
Die Sizeunknown285 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm65 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM2+
Transistorsunknown450 million
tCaseMax65°Cunknown

Compare i3-7320 vs Phenom X3 8550 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments