i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 Phenom II X2 545

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
1911 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
1025 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 Phenom II X2 545

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
15.0 FPS
1440p
24.1 FPS
1440p
11.9 FPS
2160p
15.2 FPS
2160p
7.5 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
10.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
30.7 FPS
1440p
46.5 FPS
1440p
25.1 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
41.3 FPS
w1440p
22.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
46.5 FPS
1440p
69.0 FPS
1440p
38.3 FPS
2160p
47.0 FPS
2160p
25.8 FPS
w1440p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
34.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
78.0 FPS
1440p
113.9 FPS
1440p
64.6 FPS
2160p
78.8 FPS
2160p
44.2 FPS
w1440p
102.1 FPS
w1440p
57.9 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-7320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X2 545
  • The Phenom II X2 545 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X2 545 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.

Compare i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 specifications

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Architecture

i3-7320 Phenom II X2 545
CodenameKaby LakeCallisto
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Phenom II X2 (Callisto)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#SR358HDX545WFK2DGIHDX545WFGIBOXHDX545WFK2DGMHDX545WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedJan 2017Jun 2009

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Cache

i3-7320 Phenom II X2 545
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)6MB (per core)

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Cores

i3-7320 Phenom II X2 545
# of Cores22
# of Threads42
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Features

i3-7320 Phenom II X2 545
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Performance

i3-7320 Phenom II X2 545
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier41.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP51 W80 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltageunknown1.425 V

i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Physical

i3-7320 Phenom II X2 545
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax65°Cunknown

Compare i3-7320 vs Phenom II X2 545 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments