i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
1397 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
22.5 FPS
1440p
24.1 FPS
1440p
17.9 FPS
2160p
15.2 FPS
2160p
11.3 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
15.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
43.8 FPS
1440p
46.5 FPS
1440p
35.9 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
2160p
24.0 FPS
w1440p
41.3 FPS
w1440p
31.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
65.2 FPS
1440p
69.0 FPS
1440p
53.9 FPS
2160p
47.0 FPS
2160p
36.6 FPS
w1440p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
48.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
107.9 FPS
1440p
113.9 FPS
1440p
89.9 FPS
2160p
78.8 FPS
2160p
62.0 FPS
w1440p
102.1 FPS
w1440p
80.5 FPS
i3-7320
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments