i3-12300 vs i9-13900K - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
4683 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-12300 vs i9-13900K in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.0 FPS
1080p
42.9 FPS
1440p
30.2 FPS
1440p
32.6 FPS
2160p
19.0 FPS
2160p
20.5 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
w1440p
28.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.1 FPS
1080p
76.7 FPS
1440p
56.6 FPS
1440p
60.5 FPS
2160p
37.8 FPS
2160p
40.4 FPS
w1440p
50.4 FPS
w1440p
53.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
100.1 FPS
1080p
110.4 FPS
1440p
83.0 FPS
1440p
88.4 FPS
2160p
56.7 FPS
2160p
60.3 FPS
w1440p
74.4 FPS
w1440p
79.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.3 FPS
1080p
178.0 FPS
1440p
135.9 FPS
1440p
144.2 FPS
2160p
94.3 FPS
2160p
100.2 FPS
w1440p
122.3 FPS
w1440p
129.5 FPS
i3-12300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i3-12300 vs i9-13900K specifications

i3-12300 vs i9-13900K Architecture

i3-12300 i9-13900K
ChipsetsZ690, H670, B660, H610Z690, Z790
CodenameAlder Lake-SRaptor Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed4800 MT/s5600 MT/s
ECC MemoryNoYes
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
Launch MSRP$143$589
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Part#SRL61SRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 2022Sep 27th, 2022

i3-12300 vs i9-13900K Cache

i3-12300 i9-13900K
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i9-13900K Cores

i3-12300 i9-13900K
# of Cores424
# of Threads832
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i9-13900K Performance

i3-12300 i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
PL160W253 W
PL289W253 W
PL2 Tau Limit28 secondsUnlimited
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.8 GHz

i3-12300 vs i9-13900K Physical

i3-12300 i9-13900K
Die Size163 mm²257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i3-12300 vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments