i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Phenom II X4 B95

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
3708 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1048 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Phenom II X4 B95

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.0 FPS
1080p
16.7 FPS
1440p
30.2 FPS
1440p
13.3 FPS
2160p
19.0 FPS
2160p
8.4 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
w1440p
11.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.1 FPS
1080p
33.8 FPS
1440p
56.6 FPS
1440p
27.7 FPS
2160p
37.8 FPS
2160p
18.4 FPS
w1440p
50.4 FPS
w1440p
24.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
100.1 FPS
1080p
50.9 FPS
1440p
83.0 FPS
1440p
42.0 FPS
2160p
56.7 FPS
2160p
28.5 FPS
w1440p
74.4 FPS
w1440p
37.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.3 FPS
1080p
85.0 FPS
1440p
135.9 FPS
1440p
70.8 FPS
2160p
94.3 FPS
2160p
48.5 FPS
w1440p
122.3 FPS
w1440p
63.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 B95
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 specifications

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Architecture

i3-12300 Phenom II X4 B95
CodenameAlder Lake-SDeneb
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X4 (Deneb)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61HDXB95WFK4DGI
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Cache

i3-12300 Phenom II X4 B95
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Cores

i3-12300 Phenom II X4 B95
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Performance

i3-12300 Phenom II X4 B95
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Physical

i3-12300 Phenom II X4 B95
Die Size163 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X4 B95 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments